The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(O(1), O(n^1)).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(g(x), s(0)) → f(g(x), g(x))
g(s(x)) → s(g(x))
g(0) → 0

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST

(1) CpxTrsToCdtProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Converted CpxTRS to CDT

(2) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

f(g(z0), s(0)) → f(g(z0), g(z0))
g(s(z0)) → s(g(z0))
g(0) → 0

Tuples:

F(g(z0), s(0)) → c(F(g(z0), g(z0)), G(z0), G(z0))
G(s(z0)) → c1(G(z0))

S tuples:

F(g(z0), s(0)) → c(F(g(z0), g(z0)), G(z0), G(z0))
G(s(z0)) → c1(G(z0))

K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:

f, g

Defined Pair Symbols:

F, G

Compound Symbols:

c, c1

(3) CdtUnreachableProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following tuples could be removed as they are not reachable from basic start terms:

F(g(z0), s(0)) → c(F(g(z0), g(z0)), G(z0), G(z0))

(4) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

f(g(z0), s(0)) → f(g(z0), g(z0))
g(s(z0)) → s(g(z0))
g(0) → 0

Tuples:

G(s(z0)) → c1(G(z0))

S tuples:

G(s(z0)) → c1(G(z0))

K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:

f, g

Defined Pair Symbols:

G

Compound Symbols:

c1

(5) CdtPolyRedPairProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^1))) transformation)

Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.

G(s(z0)) → c1(G(z0))

We considered the (Usable) Rules:none
And the Tuples:

G(s(z0)) → c1(G(z0))

The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation :

POL(G(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(c1(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(s(x₁)) = [2] + x₁   

(6) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

f(g(z0), s(0)) → f(g(z0), g(z0))
g(s(z0)) → s(g(z0))
g(0) → 0

Tuples:

G(s(z0)) → c1(G(z0))

S tuples:none
K tuples:

G(s(z0)) → c1(G(z0))

Defined Rule Symbols:

f, g

Defined Pair Symbols:

G

Compound Symbols:

c1

(7) SIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The set S is empty

(8) BOUNDS(O(1), O(1))